Filing readiness is an operational state: the selected case facts are reviewed, required technical inputs are present, relevant checks are current, and any remaining limitations have an accountable decision. It is not a declaration that the goods comply with the law.
A practical preparation workflow
- 1
Define the required technical inputs for the case and mapping version.
- 2
Resolve blockers and review warnings against their evidence.
- 3
Record final decisions and freeze the export snapshot.
Use blockers for conditions that must stop the handoff
Missing required data, invalid geometry, unresolved conflicts, or unavailable required checks should remain blocking. The interface should name the affected object, evidence basis, responsible owner, and next action.
Use warnings for reviewable limitations
A warning may allow a technical export, but it still needs a visible rationale and reviewer. Do not collapse warnings into a green score or hide them when the pack is generated.
Keep readiness scoped and time-bound
Readiness applies to a specific case snapshot, mapping version, and export. New evidence, changed facts, or updated rules can make the earlier result stale.
What to check
- Required facts and source references
- Current plot, consistency, and DDS checks
- Open blockers, warnings, and accepted limitations
- Authorized decision and reproducible export
Ready in Filovara means ready for the defined technical handoff; it is not a compliance certificate, legal opinion, or proof of submission.
Questions teams ask
Does ‘ready’ mean compliant?
No. It means the defined technical preparation steps for that snapshot are complete or explicitly reviewed.
Can a case be exported with warnings?
Only under the product’s configured policy and with the warnings and reviewer decisions preserved in the pack.
What makes a ready case stale?
A relevant evidence, fact, geometry, mapping, rule, or decision change should trigger a new review.